UCLA Educational Leadership Ph.D. Program
2 – Hour Presentation for 21 K-16 educators and non-profit professionals
|
No Response |
Poor | Fair | Good |
Excellent |
|
| How would you rate your instructor’s knowledge of grantwriting? |
3 |
10% |
90% |
||
|
How would you rate your instructor’s presentation? |
3 | 5% | 25% |
70% |
|
| How would you rate the instructor’s attention to your specific needs? |
3 |
5% | 15% |
80% |
|
|
How would you rate the overall presentation experience? |
3 | 5% | 20% |
75% |
|
|
How would you rate the presentation manual? |
3 | 5% | 20% |
75% |
- Participants Evaluated Their Grantwriting Knowledge Before AND After the Presentation (1 lowest, 10 highest)
| How would you rate your knowledge of grantwriting before the presentation? |
1 35% |
2
15% |
3
5% |
4
25% |
5
5% |
6
10% |
7
5% |
8
|
9
|
10
|
| How would you rate your knowledge of grantwriting after the presentation? |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
5% |
5
5% |
6
5% |
7
20% |
8
40% |
9
20% |
10 5% |
- What Our Students Said About This Presentation!
“Linda is a wonderful teacher. She is clear and methodical. She presents the A-Z process in an easy-to-understand, feasible way.”
“This was a good, general overview. It could be more interactive rather than just informational.”
“With the knowledge I gained today, I’m no longer afraid of the grantwriting process. I thought I’d never write a grant, but now I’m strongly considering doing so. It seems like a no-brainer to ask for money from people whose job it is to give money.”
“This is a great introduction to the grantwriting process. I look forward to deep diving into the online course this summer!”
“I enjoyed learning about grantwriting as an on-going ‘living’ experience instead of a ‘one & done.’ Thank you!”
“The idea of creating a routine and structures to support ongoing development work was helpful as well as the Research Information Sheet form (RIS).”
“The was an excellent workshop that gave me a clear, engaging, and enlightening overview of grantwriting. It made me excited to start the process in may center.”
“I learned the format that could be and actually should be used when writing grants.”
“Very informative and clear presentation. Helped to bring clarity to a complex process.”
“I worked as a grantwriter in my 20s and never had very much confidence in my skills. Now, since this presentation, I feel like I have the confidence to write a million grants – well, or at least one a month.”
“I appreciated the idea of a grantwriting campaign, whereby multiple grants sustain an organization or program over time.”
“I have had the experience of writing small grants in the past. I now have a much better understanding of the grantwriting process and how to develop a team to work toward substantial funding opportunities.”
“The step-by-step process helped me understand what to emphasize in grant proposals. The different types of grants to apply for and how to really emphasize this process.”
“Love the manual. Very articulate. A little dense/dry. Broke the process down in an easy to understand way – makes the process seem more do-able.”
“I knew very little about grantwriting, but I am very aware that it is critical to the inception and maintenance of faculty development programs (my research area of expertise), and now I feel a little more empowered to help go after grants to support our program.”
“Thank you for being here and lending your expertise to our class. What will be more helpful to me: 1) Less on general process and more on how to write a successful grant, 2) Less abstract and more concrete with actual examples, 3) Research grants.”
“This was a great introductory session on grantwriting. Thank you.”